Hey Memey You’re So Fine/Hey There Memlilah/Hey Meme-a-sy/Insert Lame Song Reference Here
Shelby told me to come up with ten random things about myself so I will. I actually intended to do this a few days ago but…I didn’t. Instead it has sat in my drafts folder.
So, ten random things:
1. I’m going to steal one from Shelby and give you a list of things I will not eat:
Most cheese, though I have particularly strong aversion to bleu and feta, ham, tofu or any “fake meat”, chickpeas, avocado, mayonnaise, fish, crab, sour cream, refried beans, rare beef, bologna.
2. I’m a terrible person who wants you to fail at everything you do.
This one is Self-explanatory.
3. I am incredibly lazy and really good at convincing people I’m not – partially because I am a fantastic liar.
Also self-explanatory, though this helps:
As does this.
4. I don’t like children, but I’m pretty good with them.
I can’t explain it. I once worked at a rock climbing gym where I mostly lead birthday parties for kids. People generally assumed I was a teacher because of HOW I dealt with kids. I’ve also discovered that the spawns of my friends like me. I can train them to do tricks! They do them!
But…like…I don’t like kids! I have zero maternal instinct. And the funny thing is I am pretty sure that’s WHY a lot of kids like me: they think I’m a bigger version of them. Which I pretty much am.
Because I’d much rather be throwing the tantrum than dealing with one.
5. I judge you on your appreciation of certain TV shows/movies.
More specifically, if you tell me you’ve NEVER watched either The Simpsons or Seinfeld…I get irrationally angry. Like, really angry. In fact, I think appreciation of The Simpsons and Seinfeld is a barometer for your taste in general. I once told a dude who didn’t like Seinfeld I would never bone him for that reason alone. (Though trust me, there were others. Not drinking coffee was another one as non-coffee drinkers are clearly evil robot beings that must be destroyed.)
Likewise, I will SERIOUSLY QUESTION YOU if you tell me you’ve never watched Arrested Development or The Big Lebowski.
6. “SNL ISN’T FUNNY ANYMORE” and “THE BRITISH VERSION IS BETTER” ARE NOT VALID CRITIQUES IN AND OF THEMSELVES AND I WILL PUNCH YOU IN THE FACE IF YOU ARGUE OTHERWISE.
Point the first: SNL HAS ALWAYS, ALWAYS BEEN WILDLY INCONSISTENT.
Yes, this particular cast is kind of a dud that Lorne Michaels has no apparently interest in cleaning out and Seth Myers is pretty one note as a writer (not to mention that Kristen Wiig is pretty one note in general). But fuck…THAT’S MORE OR LESS HOW SNL WORKS. Everyone remembers the good shit, but it was much easier to forget the bad shit before we had 50 billion nerds immediately jumping on SNL live threads to proclaim the death of the franchise.
Listen, toolsacks: do you remember the Anthony Michael Hall year of SNL?
No? Neither does anyone else, and that’s how Lorne wants it. So just watch the good shit on hulu and STFU.
And regarding the British thing?
Look: British humour and American humor (U SEE WHAT I DID THAR?) are different.
We get that. (And if you haven’t seen A Fish Called Wanda, you should. Probably the best take on the contrasting humor ever.) And Brit to U.S. adaptations often fail miserably as a result. Things get lost in translation because American humor is a lot broader. When it comes to TV adaptations, American TV producers generally have to think about the demands of a much longer season and the constant push for ratings. So for various reasons, things have to change. AND IT OFTEN JUST DOESN’T WORK.
And it often doesn’t work when they try it other way either:
Yes, that’s a British take on Married With Children called Married for Life. (Go figure slapping British characters in the place of crude, American stereotypes DOESN’T WORK.)
But will producers learn? Well, no. They won’t. And anyone who knows a fucking thing about how this works realizes this. Which is why replying to an article announcing an American adaptation of a British show whining about how horrible an idea it is and how the British version will always be better is STUPID. So stop doing it.
7. I generally can’t sleep if other people are in the room.
Must…not…show…weakness.
8. In addition to my documented hatred of mayo, I don’t like Ketchup.
SUCK ON THAT.
9. I really want to know when talking about food got as loaded as talking about politics.
Two sample conversations for you:
Scene: In my office 4 years ago with dumb, redneck co-worker:
Dude: Yo. I don’t get vegetarians.
Me: Yeah, not my thing either.
Dude: I KNOW RIGHT? I MEAN, HOW CAN YOU NOT EAT COWS.
Me: I get how you don’t have to, just not my thing.
Dude: But I mean, cows are like….sacred animals. Sacred because I eat every part of them! (yes, that’s an actual quote.)
Me: Ha. Not a milk/cheese fan.
Dude: Man, I’d be fine only eating pieces of a cow from now on! Screw carrots!
Me: I like a good burger as much as anything but I’d die without some vegetables to balance it out…
Dude: Screw carrots! Just meat!
Scene 2: Check out of a small co-op. I am buying some granola, quinoa, coconut milk ice cream and some free-range chicken.
Clerk: Nice day, huh!
Me: Yep.
Clerk: Hm, this is weird…why is this so expensive? You only got four things!
Me: ::blank stare:: Um, it looks like everything rang up right?
Clerk: Oh, I see how. You bought this big hunk of meat.
Me: ::blanker stare::
Clerk: MEAT? IS EXPENSIVE.
Me: ::smiles uncomfortably::
Clerk: THINK ABOUT IT.
***
Why did I share these stupid conversations?
Because it seems shit like this is more commonplace, much like stupid quasi-political “MY SIDE IS BETTER THAN YOUR SIDE” shit you see when you casually like a link on facebook about what cause or the other.
In the first conversation, an idiot makes an idiotic comment and just keeps getting dumber. He’s not speaking from any logical place, he’s just making his opinion known. Because he has X preferences, anything that is Y is dumb and useless.
The the second, I’m subtly judged. I’m at a co-op buying very specific items. I’m clearly not there to browse, I clearly have some clue of why I’m there and what I’m doing. But I get judged for not doing ENOUGH to be pro whatever this guys’s deal was.
The similarity to this kind of shit and political discourse was striking at the time and continues to be. At the end of the day I don’t particularly give a fuck what you eat and don’t eat. If you ask me for a restaurant suggestion and you’re a steak lover, I’ll give it to you. If you want vegan options, I’ll give that to you to. I might roll my eyes if you tell me you’d rather eat a Hungry Man Dinner than a steak you make yourself. I might also roll my eyes if you assume the fact that I eat red meat and hate tofu means I hate anything healthy. I’d like to think I can listen to both sides and make an educated decision.
Like it is in politics, the “correct” answer doesn’t have to come from the extremes, and tacit support of one “side” doesn’t mean you automatically have no respect for the ideals of the others.
Just saying.
10. I’ve been known to drink shots of pickle juice.
You’re welcome, Shelby.
Tags: Do this if you haven’t, that includes you PP.

I want to be you when I grow up.
I can give you lessons.
I’d pay for that. It’d probably be worth more than my soon-to-be BA in le liberal arts.
I understand judging people by the tv shows and films they like. I personally think less of anyone, who has not taken the time to watch Mad Men. However, I hate Seinfeld and can match your anger with my own for all the people, who judge me for not liking it. M*A*S*H is and forever will be the apex of the sitcom world, with Cheers as a close second. I just don’t like it Seinfeld. Sorry. Fuck you very much! The Simpson are awesome, but I’ve lost interest after so many years. Couldn’t agree more about the SNL and the British version was better thing. IF one more person attempts to tell me how great South Park is I may just vomit on them. However — I will tell anyone, who will listen, that Archer is Awesome and they a inherently flawed on a genetic level if they don’t like it! Yes, I understand that this stance mace me a bit of a self-contradictory twat, but . . . Don’t Care!
Ok, so here comes the TV Geek take on Seinfeld:
In many ways, it changed the “sitcom” more than MASH did, and I love MASH. But think about it. MASH was so fucking groundbreaking – an innovator in oh so many ways from plot lines to plot devices to talking heads. They covered pretty much all ground possible….and then with the exception of Cheers (also love), most of the sitcoms that came out in the 80s were cheery, family comedies. MASH was SO ahead of its time and nobody could possibly follow up the act. So you had all of these relentlessly cheery shows that turned the TV comedy landscape into DRECK. The whole family sitcom trend was sooo prevalent, and everything had HAPPY FUCKING ENDINGS. (MASH sure as hell didn’t, but nobody could even go back there and touch it.)
Larry David ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS considered Seinfeld a dark comedy. And frankly, it wasn’t something that SHOULD have become a mainstream hit. The only reason why it did? Snappy dialogue. It’s fucking quotable. And people would quote it being completely oblivious to the fact that IT WAS DARK, CYNICAL HUMOR. But it was so well crafted most people didn’t notice. (Unlike, say, Get A Life which was too out there to click with people.) But because they pushed the envelope with what was “ok” then, there are plenty of darker comedies out there now. If Susan hadn’t died from licking envelopes, there would be no dead hooker bodies in hallways in Sunny or an Archer.
As far as Cheers, one of the best crafted sitcoms of all time and a big inspiration to Mike Schnur with Parks and Rec. While I’m quick to find the Simpsons-King of the Hill similarities there, you can sense how much Schnur was going for a similar sort of “heart without bashing you over the head with it” feel Cheers always had.
Re: The Simpsons – they still knock it out of the park now and then.
Re: South Park – I lost my taste for that show. I like how a certain segment of the right wing likes to claim it as “theirs” given that it’s far more conservative than your typical “prime time” show. But I wonder how closely they really look at that considering it’s pretty clear neither Parker nor Stone want to be affiliated with any side 100%. It’d be easy to classify it as a libertarian bent if they weren’t so vocal about reminding people “HEY NOTHING MATTERS IN LIFE.” Talk about fucking cynical…
P.S. Seriously thinking of staring a different blog to wax philosophic about TV. Too pretentious? Too stupid? Too pointless?
I could go on about these shows forever as well. One of the true testaments to both Cheers and MASH is that the not only survived numerous cast changes, but actually used them to keep their shows fresh. The additions of Winchester and Frazier alone changed the dynamics of both shows for the better and those changes were not even the biggies for either show! My issue with Seinfeld has always been that I just didn’t like it as much as other people around me did, who went on about it endlessly. Plus . . . Jerry’s voice make me nuts . . . just the sound of it grates on my nerves, which is heard to over look. Innovative show . . . for sure, but now my hatred has become a point of pride and there is no swaying that. BTW: the thing that I love . . . love . . .love about MASH is the emotional depth that it brought to the format, which wasn’t repeated again until Scrubs. Which, Ironically, has been compared to a live action version of the Simpsons.
So, based on Jerry Seinfeld’s voice and popular reaction you’re being a contrarian?! Tsk tsk. The thing is, so many dumb people that latched on to who didn’t even appreciate what they were watching. I remember wanting to slap people who did the “ITS LIKE ME AND MY FRIENDS” shit, because in most case it wasn’t. (In my case? I’m an asshole and so are my friends so….) There are plenty of valid things to rally against such as Glee or Lost. (Mine is Star Wars. Never watched more than a few minutes of one, and I just CAN’T now.)
Scrubs was really it’s own thing, if you ask me – the humor is almost twee in retrospect, but it still worked. And yes, particularly the early episodes.
Fact: Lilith and Cliff are my favorites. This should make a lot of sense to you “knowing” me. Another Fact: Definitely prefer the Rebecca years to the Diane. ;p
I too perfer the Rebecca years. Love Norm and huge fan of Carla and Lilith.
Staring a different blog to wax philosophic about TV is possibly too pretentious and possibly pointless, but it shouldn’t stop you. Heck my sister already does it and she has a pod cast.
I’m getting more and more tempted to actually start one…
When someone doesn’t understand my Seinfeld reference, I give them the side eye. It’s slight, but it’s there none the less.
I am lucky that my work neighbor both enjoys the finer points of Seinfeld, Arrested, Mad Men, and the Simpsons. I would Choo Choo choose him any day.
hahaha…Funny, I especially cringe when people don’t recognize CHOO CHOO CHOOSE me. Because really, even if you have never seen the show you HAD TO HAVE HEARD SOMEONE ELSE SAY IT.
BTW: anyone that doesn’t drink coffee needs to be check for Alien DNA. And, every sane person in this world should hence forth agree not to fuck these people. Truely, I find Amanda Seyfried nearly irrestiable (hell I even watched Letters to Juliet . . . don’t ask), but if she didn’t like coffee . . . she be just another skank. And that’s just the way it is.
I do hope you were watching it for wank material…
Got free tickets and my wife wanted to go. We made fun of it the whole way through and nearly got toss out. Had a great time!
When people tell me they don’t like Seinfeld I have to try really hard not to slap them. And ps-
Forget it, Donny, you’re out of your element!
I don’t watch TV at all and haven’t for years (probably since MASH was on), but I like your blog and appreciate it as a get-real antidote to most of the rest of the running blog world. In particular, it’s refreshing to have someone tell me OUT LOUD that she wants me to fail at everything I do. I’m completely serious about that. I’m not saying I want to hear that all the time, but failing is going to happen sometimes, and so is wishing someone’s huge streak of success would end so they could just come back to earth for God’s sake–and those things happen regardless of breathless and dishonest endorsements of “believing in oneself” and “supporting one another.”
Oh, and totally agree with you on #9–politicized, self-righteous discussions about food are BORING and ANNOYING. As for liking kids, I have two of them and I can tell you I’d rather have fewer breathless idealizers of children and more people interested in seeing that they turn into decent adults around them.
Thanks!
A lot of people really do idealize kids, and it’s kind of disturbing. They can be pretty funny and all but it really does depend on a lot of shit other than GIVE LITTLE JOHNNY WHATEVER THE FUCK HE WANTS. But you know this, clearly.
4. I don’t like children, but I’m pretty good with them.
Hmmmm….. same with me.
I’m extremely awkward around children. I assume this will continue until I find myself knocked up (years down the road of course) and forced into the role…
re #2: JUST REMEMBER THAT BLOWING SOMEONE ELSE’S CANDLE OUT DOESN”T MAKE URS BURN ANY BRIGHTER!~*
I would like to invite you over for halibut tacos topped with refried beans, sour cream, and guacamole, and I promise we can watch something awesome on TV like…say… Pretty Little Liars? It’s a fave.
I <3 U
Nice.
I also judge people by their entertainment choices, but with me it’s movies. Just don’t care about TV that much. Except that if you like Survivor, and most other “reality” shows, I think you’re an idiot. Seinfeld always left me divided, though. There is nothing I like better than great dialogue, and Seinfeld had it(I quote it routinely). I just didn’t LIKE any of the characters. Ok, maybe Kramer. Sometimes. But there was never a time when I didn’t want George off my screen.
But I don’t drink coffee, so what do I know. Never developed a taste for any grown-up drinks.
And thanks for not eating crab. Leaves more for me!
Well, you’re not supposed to like them, that’s the whole point – they’re assholes! This was a pretty new idea in the 90s.
I do not drink coffee, but if I am an evil robot I’m one with an Arrested Development loving heart.
It’s not necessarily that I don’t like Seinfeld…I’ve only seen maybe two or three episodes. I don’t watch much TV in general. I also never watched Friends, Sex in the City, Grey’s, or any other show that people usually reference. Same goes with movies. Oops?
Seinfeld is the only one of those worth your time. Friends and Grey’s SUCK so hard, though as a nurse you might laugh at Grey’s. Likewise for SATC as you are someone who lives in NYC.
Oh blessed day, finally someone else noticed that Kristen Wiggs characters all the same — and largely some version of the chic who is uncontainably excited about a secret surprise for someone else.
But….I LOVE this season. The newer kids….Taran Killem, that other new white guy, Abby Elliot, Bobby Moynaham. Rock my socks. And I’m pretty cool with Nadeem Pedrah (sp?). And Fred Armisan FOREVAAA. ok thanks for listening
Taran Killem is coming onto his own…the anime sketch had me falling off the couch.
Holy crap: I just stumbled on your blog, and already with the awesome? Man!
[Hits "subscribe"]